The new case I have in mind is one which tests the constitutionality of the Supreme Court and its Washington State Bar Association. The WSBA has been taken over by the Washington Supreme Court as I will explain in the complaint to be filed. I will call it for now “the Washington Supreme Court and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Washington State Bar Association and its members. This case is planned to test constitionality of requiring a lawyer who, in order to practice law in Washington in order to practice law , a. must pay annual dues, b. pay for …
I see my efforts regarding the Washington Lawyer Defense moving toward what might be the end of this chapter of in which I have generally come to a new case about WSBA and the Washington Supreme Court and a case which addresses the wrongdoing toward me and my clients. There are two cases. The first is directed the constitutionality of the Supreme Court / WSBA. The second addressas the damages sufferered by Steve Eugster and his client, Robert Caruso.
On November 18, 2020, I paid my WSBA 2021 dues under protest. My letter to the Justices of the State Supreme Court and the Governors of the WSBA Board of Governors can be found at this link: 2020_11_18_Payment of Dues Under Protest
Riley, Stewart. Helena Star: An Epic Adventure Through the Murky Underworld of International Drug Smuggling. Robert D. Reed Publishers. Kindle Edition. Amazon, Kindle, and Paperback Stewart Riley has given us a fine book, a remarkable book. It is about a young man from Spokane, the largest city on the vast northern tier expanse between Seattle and Minneapolis/St. Paul. In 1966, Stew Riley became a student at the University of Washington School of Law in Seattle. The time was long before Seattle on the West Coast became the East Coast darling at the other end of the Yellowstone Trail. Claiming to …
Today I filed an Application for Leave to File — complaint against the individual justices of the Washington Supreme Court. The issue is whether the WSBA an integrated association of lawyers, limited practice officers, and limited license legal technicians violates the holding in Janus v, AFSCME. This case is different from the petition for writ of certiorari of Jarchow v. Wisconsin State Bar Association now before the United States Supreme Court Docket Doc_4_Application for Leave Doc_4-1 2020_04_13_Draft of Complaint_Case 13A Doc_5 Motion to Disqualify Judge Doc_5-1_Declaration ISOM Motion to Disqualify Judge
The bar association filed a 9th Circuit R. 3-6 motion. I have responded with a Petition for Rehearing En Banc. Doc_17_Petition for Re Hearing En Banc
The Supreme Court will consider the new Fleck Petition for Cert. It has been distributed for conference this coming Friday, March 6, 2020. https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/19-670.html Here is a Geo. Will column on February 28, 2020 — https://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/supreme-court-s-fine-janus-decision-merits-encore/article_d2dd2ba3-75f0-5566-826a-9f91ba00f470.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=email&utm_campaign=user-share