Author Archives: Stephen Eugster

Washington Lawyer Defense Project

Washington Lawyer Defense is now Washington Lawyer Defense Project. Efforts called “Washington Lawyer Defense” begun early on, are still on-going in one way or another.  Today, however, the efforts have expanded into a broader effort, a larger project. So, the name … Continue reading

Posted in Lawyers Disbarred | Comments Off on Washington Lawyer Defense Project

WSBA Members Need Email Lists and Other Information

RE: WSBA Member Address and Email Records Dear Ms. Littlewood: As you know, I am a member of the Washington State Bar Association. Indeed, presently I am a member in good standing with the WSBA. As a member of the WSBA, … Continue reading

Posted in Lawyers Disbarred | Comments Off on WSBA Members Need Email Lists and Other Information

Petition for Writs of Mandamus to Justices of Supreme Court of Washington

Steve Eugster has filed a case in the Washinton Supreme Court seeking writs of mandamus to each of the justices of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in writs of mandamus against state officers. Wash. Const. Art. IV, … Continue reading

Posted in Lawyers Disbarred | Comments Off on Petition for Writs of Mandamus to Justices of Supreme Court of Washington

Opening Brief in Eugster v. WSBA (9th Cir.)

The Opening Brief in the appeal of Pro se Steve Eugster growing out of the Caruso v. WSBA was filed this morning.  Get the brief.  2017_10_31_Opening_Brief_  See more about this and the two appeals growing out of Caruso v.WSBA.  Go … Continue reading

Posted in Lawyers Disbarred | Comments Off on Opening Brief in Eugster v. WSBA (9th Cir.)

Pro se Eugster v. WSBA

Pro se Eugster v. WSBA, is a separate appeal coming from Caruso et al. v. WSBA et al.  It has to do with an order of the court awarding the WSBA some $28,000 plus from Pro se Eugster.  The Opening … Continue reading

Posted in Lawyers Disbarred | Comments Off on Pro se Eugster v. WSBA

Case 9 — Appeal of Orders Against Attorney Eugster, Opening Brief

The District Court judge ordered me to pay some $28,000 to the WSBA. I appealed. The appeal is a separate appeal in Caruso v. WSBA (Case 9). I am working my opening brief. It is due about the 1st of … Continue reading

Posted in Lawyers Disbarred | Comments Off on Case 9 — Appeal of Orders Against Attorney Eugster, Opening Brief

Case 3 9th Circuit Affirms Trial Court Decision

The 9th Circuit has affirmed the trial court.  Doc_18_1_Memorandum

Posted in Eugster Case History | Comments Off on Case 3 9th Circuit Affirms Trial Court Decision

Case 4 and Case 5 — What may happen on appeal

Case 4 and Case 5 The issue in each case (Case 4 is in Superior Court, Spokane; Case 5 is in US District Court WAED) is whether the WSBA Washington Discipline System is constitutional, does it accord with requirements of … Continue reading

Posted in Case V, Federal Court | Comments Off on Case 4 and Case 5 — What may happen on appeal

Receivership for the Washington State Bar Association

The Washington State Bar Association must be placed into a receivership. The Association known as the WSBA or state bar is a legal entity which was created by the Washington state legislature under the State Bar Act of 1933. The … Continue reading

Posted in Receivership of WSBA | Comments Off on Receivership for the Washington State Bar Association

Legal Zoom and “Real Advice”

Legal Zoom is advertising “real advice.”  That sounds like it is “practicing law.”  What is the Washington Supreme Court going to do?  Maybe it will create a special license which allows Legal Zoom to provide limited practice services. I wonder whether there can be … Continue reading

Posted in Unauthorized Practice of Law | Comments Off on Legal Zoom and “Real Advice”