It looks like Janus v. AFSCME may have direct application to the issue of whether the Washington Supreme Court/ WSBA (see General Rule 12.2) meets exacting scrutiny under the First Amendment. See also, Arnold Fleck v. North Dakota Bar Association (Wetch) petition for writ of certiorari. Go here.
This afternoon I received word that the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez has imposed a pre-filing order on me. Doc_68_Order re Pre-filing.
I have a hearing before Judge Ray Clary of the Spokane Superior Court. It is on my motion the WSBA and Executive Director Littlewood be ordered to give me (a member of the WSBA) a data file of email addresses of WSBA members. The basis for the motion is common law and the right of… Read More »
Over the next two weeks I will be working on a response to a motion for attorneys fees against me by Executive Director Littlewood, Case XII, motion to dismiss the personal injury action I have brought against the Bar Association and others in Spokane County Superior Court, Case XXII, and my opening brief in the… Read More »
Case 9: Robert Caruso and Sandra Ferguson v. WSBA, WAWD #2:17-cv-0003-RSM Issues: Whether New WSBA 2017 violates freedom of non-association and expression (First Amendment) and right to procedural due process (Fifth Amendment) and the New WSBA has the power to discipline lawyers under the current Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct (ELC). The trial judge… Read More »
Washington Lawyer Defense is now Washington Lawyer Defense Project. Efforts called “Washington Lawyer Defense” begun early on, are still on-going in one way or another. Today, however, the efforts have expanded into a broader effort, a larger project. So, the name change. Washington Lawyer Defense Project. For example, as the work progressed, other seemingly matters would… Read More »
RE: WSBA Member Address and Email Records Dear Ms. Littlewood: As you know, I am a member of the Washington State Bar Association. Indeed, presently I am a member in good standing with the WSBA. As a member of the WSBA, I am tied to the Fifth Congressional District. I am considering the possibility of running for… Read More »
Steve Eugster has filed a case in the Washinton Supreme Court seeking writs of mandamus to each of the justices of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in writs of mandamus against state officers. Wash. Const. Art. IV, Section 4. The Court will have to create a temporary Supreme Court pursuant to Wash. Const.… Read More »
The Opening Brief in the appeal of Pro se Steve Eugster growing out of the Caruso v. WSBA was filed this morning. Get the brief. 2017_10_31_Opening_Brief_ See more about this and the two appeals growing out of Caruso v.WSBA. Go here.
Pro se Eugster v. WSBA, is a separate appeal coming from Caruso et al. v. WSBA et al. It has to do with an order of the court awarding the WSBA some $28,000 plus from Pro se Eugster. The Opening Brief will be filed on or before November 1, 2017. The brief will focus, significantly,… Read More »